🔗 Share this article

Thhese times showcase a very distinctive situation: the first-ever US march of the caretakers. Their attributes range in their expertise and characteristics, but they all possess the common mission – to avert an Israeli infringement, or even destruction, of Gaza’s unstable truce. Since the conflict ended, there have been rare days without at least one of the former president's delegates on the scene. Only recently featured the likes of a senior advisor, a businessman, JD Vance and a political figure – all appearing to execute their roles.

The Israeli government keeps them busy. In only a few short period it launched a wave of attacks in the region after the killings of two Israel Defense Forces (IDF) troops – leading, according to reports, in many of Palestinian casualties. Several leaders called for a resumption of the conflict, and the Israeli parliament enacted a initial decision to incorporate the occupied territories. The American reaction was somehow ranging from “no” and “hell no.”

But in more than one sense, the US leadership seems more concentrated on preserving the current, tense stage of the peace than on advancing to the following: the reconstruction of the Gaza Strip. Regarding that, it appears the US may have ambitions but few specific proposals.

Currently, it remains unclear at what point the suggested global governing body will effectively assume control, and the identical is true for the designated security force – or even the makeup of its soldiers. On a recent day, Vance declared the US would not impose the composition of the international unit on Israel. But if the prime minister's government keeps to dismiss one alternative after another – as it acted with the Turkish suggestion this week – what follows? There is also the opposite issue: which party will decide whether the forces favoured by the Israelis are even prepared in the mission?

The matter of the duration it will take to neutralize the militant group is similarly vague. “The expectation in the leadership is that the global peacekeeping unit is intends to at this point take the lead in disarming the organization,” stated the official this week. “That’s going to take some time.” The former president only emphasized the lack of clarity, declaring in an conversation recently that there is no “hard” timeline for Hamas to demilitarize. So, in theory, the unknown participants of this still unformed international contingent could deploy to the territory while the organization's fighters continue to remain in control. Are they facing a leadership or a guerrilla movement? These are just a few of the issues emerging. Others might wonder what the verdict will be for ordinary Palestinians under current conditions, with the group persisting to focus on its own opponents and dissidents.

Latest developments have afresh underscored the gaps of Israeli reporting on each side of the Gaza boundary. Every source attempts to analyze all conceivable aspect of the group's breaches of the peace. And, in general, the situation that the organization has been delaying the return of the remains of killed Israeli captives has taken over the coverage.

On the other hand, attention of civilian fatalities in the region caused by Israeli operations has received scant focus – if any. Consider the Israeli counter strikes following a recent Rafah occurrence, in which a pair of troops were fatally wounded. While local sources reported 44 casualties, Israeli media analysts complained about the “moderate response,” which focused on just infrastructure.

That is not new. Over the previous weekend, the media office charged Israel of breaking the truce with the group 47 occasions since the ceasefire was implemented, killing dozens of individuals and wounding an additional many more. The allegation appeared irrelevant to the majority of Israeli reporting – it was simply ignored. Even accounts that 11 individuals of a local household were fatally shot by Israeli soldiers last Friday.

The rescue organization said the family had been seeking to go back to their home in the Zeitoun neighbourhood of the city when the transport they were in was targeted for supposedly crossing the “yellow line” that marks territories under Israeli army control. This boundary is not visible to the human eye and shows up only on charts and in authoritative records – often not obtainable to ordinary individuals in the region.

Even that incident barely received a mention in Israeli news outlets. Channel 13 News covered it briefly on its online platform, citing an IDF spokesperson who stated that after a suspect car was identified, forces fired warning shots towards it, “but the car kept to move toward the troops in a manner that posed an imminent danger to them. The soldiers shot to remove the risk, in accordance with the ceasefire.” Zero injuries were reported.

With such narrative, it is no surprise many Israeli citizens believe Hamas exclusively is to blame for violating the peace. That perception could lead to fuelling appeals for a tougher approach in Gaza.

Eventually – perhaps sooner rather than later – it will no longer be sufficient for all the president’s men to take on the role of supervisors, telling the Israeli government what to avoid. They will {have to|need